(reminder – fill in something interesting)

I don’t have a tagline.

Punny game February 8, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 10:35 am
Tags: , ,

Modi & I were talking on the phone yesterday, discussing movies.

Modi: Yeah, so I watched ‘Die Hard’ yesterday.

Me: Oh, how is it? I’ve never watched any of those movies.

Modi: Really? I think they’re pretty good.

Me: What about ‘Die Hard with a Vengeance’? What a stupid name for a movie. I mean ‘Die Hard’ ‘with a vengeance’. Thu.

Modi: … Yeah, I guess it’s a silly name, but it’s a good movie.

Me: What about LFODH? ‘Live Free or Die Hard,’ it seems. Why don’t the producers come up with a slightly more sensible name?

Modi: No. That’s a terrible piece of crap. It’s one of those movies that’s all about the computers, and then gets it horribly wrong. Not one technical thing is correct.

Me: I HATE those movies. Sort of like the VB GUI clip from CSI: New York.

Modi: Yeah, like that. Besides, it’s not made in the same mould as the previous Die Hard movies. Not at all like them, it really annoyed me.

Me: (with obvious delight writ large in my voice) So, hmm, it’s probably not for a die-hard fan, eh?

I was waiting to say that from the start of the conversation.

Modi: Uh… macha, you’re a dumbfuck da.

 

Four stories February 6, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 1:46 am

This happened last week.

We were in the bus, on a long journey – tiresome and uncomfortable at its worst. To alleviate the stifling boredom, I said, “I’m going to tell you four stories.”

She said, “Okay, shoot.”

A: Three lifetimes ago, when I was much younger, less worldly-wise and more content, I participated in the preliminary rounds of the Inter-House quiz contest. I wasn’t very good, but, with my mum’s encouragement, I decided to give it a shot. One afternoon, after school had ended at 1:30, 4 of us lined up by the basketball court, and the Head Boy, who was in my house, conducted an informal oral round of selection. I remember him asking where the Winter Olympics were being conducted that year, and I blurted out, “Tokyo,” or some such thing. As it happened, that was the right answer and I was elated. Unfortunately, the question hadn’t been addressed to me, and the bright opportunist whose question it was picked up the slack and immediately repeated my articulation. Fighting tears, I pointed out how unjust the selection was, and was told, “Tough luck.” Watching the quiz a few weeks later, I remember my classmate answering, in the final, tie-breaking round of the quiz, that entomology was the study of the environment. His house lost, and perhaps, it was us who won. There was a bout of elation in class that afternoon and a round of jeers for the boy who had got it wrong, because we had studied precisely this topic in biology a few weeks preivously.

She asked, “Did you ever go up for another quiz?”

“Yes,” I said, “A few years later, I remember very well being in the team that came last. The only question I managed to answer involved identifying the movie that Seal’s ‘Kiss from a Rose” featured in. Another house got a question on Kapil Dev’s 175* against Zimbabwe in the ‘83 WC. But anyway, that was another lifetime, and it wasn’t important.”

B: Two lifetimes ago, a little older, a tad wiser (or perhaps I was deluding myself), I used to play tennis in the mornings at the University courts under a coach. It was a glorious summer, perhaps one of my favourites – warm weather, blue skies and plenty of friends. It was in that summer when two friends came over one evening – one of them was spending the next few days at my house, since his family was going to be out of town, and the other was just passing time – we really had nothing much to do in those days; perhaps a little work, an hour or two at most, in the day, after tennis, and the afternoons and evenings were devoted to television, long phone conversations, downloading music and stuff like that.

That particular day, we were talking some nonsense and generally goofing off, listening to music (Alternative was the flavour of the year). At some point in the evening, I had an argument with one friend, and I told her to get lost, before leaving in a huff to my room. I showered, cooled off and came out and life carried on as it had before. A few weeks later, I found out that during the course of my ablutions, the other two had kissed, in my study, behind the stained glass, in a tiny alcove.

“What happened when you found out?” she asked me.

“Well,” replied I, “I felt betrayed that they felt they couldn’t tell me then. I was angry, but I controlled myself for a few weeks, and when a friend who had left school the previous year returned for a visit, I told him. Oh, there were many tears shed. But it didn’t sour anything or have any real lasting effects.”

C: A lifetime ago, after a concert in early August, a friend and I were looking desperately for a place to eat and drink. The previous year I had managed to sneak into a bar underage, and we were looking to repeat that feat. When we were told that the bar was full, we were pretty annoyed and walked around to find another place. While crossing the road near a flyover, I felt the urge to run in my new shoes and while sprinting about, I tripped in the middle of the road and fell flat on my front. No harm, no cars, fortunately. My friend and my driver looked at me strangely, probably wondering what the hell I was doing. Ten minutes later, we found ourselves at a restaurant that had opened very recently. There was going to be a bit of a wait, but it was a reasonably pleasant evening, so we sat on one of those EB boxes with the little ledges. My friend pulled out his pack of cigarettes that I had just bought him and took a puff. We were not discussing anything in particular – watching the traffic go by at a more sedate pace than usual, it being 10 pm or thereabout on a Saturday evening. A large, well-designed hotel was across the road, and we watched the cars full of guests enter and leave.

“Did you finally manage to have the drink?” she asked.

“No,” I said, “But that wasn’t the point of the evening – we weren’t looking to get drunk or anything, we had to go home after that. The drink was just to, you know, sort-of chat around, if you get what I mean. The time we spent outside the restaurant, and after that, while we were eating dinner served the same purpose, without the inebriation.”

D: In this lifetime, there was a great period of loneliness when I interned in a big city on the coast. I didn’t know too many people around my flat or at work, and consequently, I spent most of my time by myself. Most Saturday afternoons, when the weather was warm, I would take the train to a hookah bar and sit in their courtyard, I guess, and smoke and read or listen to music and watch the world go by. One evening, a blond guy wearing glasses sat at the next table, and we struck up a conversation either about the exorbitant price of the sheesha or the book he was reading, which I had read parts of. We talked and talked and talked for hours until even the summer sun decided to bid us adieu – we had discussed subway systems, his travels to the Middle East, banking systems, economics, his admission into a prestigious university on the other coast for a PhD, the tsunami that struck a few years previously, my city, his and all topics under the sun. I never got to know his name, but remember him riding away on his bicycle as I headed in the opposite direction the train station.

“Found him on Facebook?” she asked.

“As what?” I replied, “I don’t remember whether he told me his name, and even if he did, I don’t know what it was. I know where he studied, and where he was going to study, but that’s all.”

“I have something to ask you,” she said, “What do these stories have to do with each other? And what do they have to do with anything? I mean, it’s not that I didn’t enjoy hearing them, but what am I supposed to make of them? I can’t see how they’re connected or anything…”

“There’s nothing more to them than what you just said – I was just thinking about my past. How it used to be, what it isn’t now.”

 

$10 laptop February 3, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 10:49 pm

I heard of this remarkable invention last week, and was amazed that it had escaped my notice. Today, in Tirupati, the Ministry of Human Resources Development unveiled a project that was a joint collaboration between the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore and IIT-Madras to develop an inexpensive laptop to be used in schools and colleges across India. As you may have guessed from the title of this post, it is to cost $10.

I’m completely and utterly confused by what’s going on, though. People knew that the announcement was going to happen today (3rd Feb). A quick search of Google News assured me of this. What is less clear is what exactly happened. The reason for my confusion is that last week I knew what, broadly, what the laptop would be like – 10″ by 5″ screen, 2 GB drive, ethernet, wireless, and, AMAZINGLY, 2 Watts of power consumption.

What’s confusing to me is, if we already know what we do know, what was the purpose of today’s grand proclamation? Today, according to what I can comprehend from various conflicting and possibly contradictory sources, the laptop prototype (not displayed, not shown, not seen) will have “a 10″ x 5″ screen, 2 GB hard drive, ethernet, wireless, and will operate on 2 Watts of power.”

Thanks for last week’s news. What will the laptop look like? What are the technical specifications? All this and more hidden behind a veil of mystery.

However, the reason that said event even merits a post on this blog (which seeks to only cover the important stuff, of course) is this corker from the Times of India titled “$10-laptop proves to be a damp squib“.

Let’s see the rest of this article, shall we?

First para:

The much-touted laptop for the masses said to have been built by students of Vellore Institute of Technology that would cost a mere Rs 500 actually turned out to be only a computing device.

Only a computing device, you say? Only a computing device. It’s true that I’m not the smartest chap, but the last time I checked, a laptop was a computing device. And now they go and change the definition on me. Unfair!

Second para:

… joint secretary N K Sinha said the computing device is 10 inches long and 5 inches wide and has been priced at around $30 at the event. However, he refused to comment as to why was it being projected as a laptop when it was not.

One website says $20, another $10 and this one says $30. Despite the vast disparity in prices, I won’t say anything, because there are as many contradictions among reports as there are reports themselves. However, if the “computing device” is not a laptop, then what exactly is it?

The third paragraph takes the trouble to clear my doubts (emphasis mine):

The so-called laptop actually turned out to be a storage device containing megabytes of data info which can be accessed by a user by connecting this device to a laptop. It meant that unlike the internet, this device can display that information that has already been stored.

So, this device contains several megabytes of this mysterious “data info” that can be accessed upon connecting the “so-called laptop” to an actual laptop. The author sees something that I don’t because there is a comparison between a standalone device and a network consisting of billions of devices (i.e., the Internet). The “device” can display information that it has stored in it, but the Internet can’t, it appears.

Earlier, I said that the 3rd paragraph cleared my doubts as to the nature of the “computing device”, right? I was wrong – my doubts are now magnified, amplified, exponentiated – whatever you want to call it.

How on earth did Times of India publish this writing?

 

Heaaaavvvvvvyyyyy Entertainment (repost from my old blog) February 2, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 10:37 pm

This is one of my favourite posts. I used to write so much better than do I now. *sigh*

It was a sultry Monday in July at the time. I remember it quite clearly (takes a sip of his coffee, and thinks back with a pang of nostalgia at the bitter-sweet irony of life and continues with the story after making a rather long and pointless parenthesised comment, a pathetic attempt to amuse himself and others). It was my 3rd or 4th week in PS in the 11th and we were being rigorously schooled in the procedures and protocols of the Chemistry laboratory.

Thinking myself too good for the institution, I was acting cool. Hands in pockets, lips pursed and an air of indifference about me, I stood in the back and paid little heed to the useful (coughs to hide laughter) information being disseminated by Mrs. Anandavalli & Sundari.

Fatman, also uninterested in what they had to say, was a model of restlessness beside me. No longer able to bear his constant fidgeting, I put out a tentative feeler, “What’s up da?” This was at a time when Fatman & I weren’t the bosom buddies we are now. We struck up an conversation about humdrum topics such as who he knew in Sishya, the weather and why Jaya (the lab attendant) yelled so much. The focus shifted to music, and Fatman, being something of an enthusiastic show-off, proceeded to inform me of his vast knowledge of the English music scene (to his credit, he knows a fair bit).

He interrogated me on my tastes and preferences. Having heard Robbie Williams’s “Come Undone,” only days previously, and being quite impressed by it, I dropped that singer’s name. With a triumphant “Aha!” Fatman seized the opportunity to tell me that he was well aware of Mr. Williams’s style and several of his songs, one of them being “Heavy Entertainment.” He proceeded to sing the chorus rather badly, with a pained expression on his face, “Heeaaaaavvvvvvyyyyyy Entertainment!”

I hadn’t heard the original, though after this rendition, I hastily made a mental note not to listen to it. However, as Fate decreed it, I bought a CD that very December that had a song by Robbie Williams on it. It was called “Let Me Entertain You.” As I’ve mentioned before, I quite like his music, so I put the track on. Listening to it, Fatman’s scrunched-up face and arms flailing in an attempt to imitate a guitar came to mind. I immediately collapsed on the bed in peals & spasms of laughter.

In my car, a few days later, I played Fatman the song, and insisted that he listen to it. Being the lying ass that he is, he swore, upon his mum, dad, and several ancestors, that he had uttered the same words Robbie was crooning, that fateful day in the lab.

To this day, he denies any such incident.

But you, (hopefully amused) reader, do know the truth. And truth it is I tell.

 

The Big Picture February 2, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 9:30 pm

My obsession with blogs continues. The Big Picture, a blog on boston.com, contains huge photographs from various current events and some of them are fantastic. I usually like the ones with landscapes, both natural and urban, while I’m not really a fan of shots that have people in them – seems to spoil it somehow.

Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3 subway station

Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3 subway station

This one is part of a series featuring Beijing’s preparation for the 2008 Olympics in August. I urge you to check it out post-haste.

 

The Curious Case of Forrest Gump February 2, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 7:46 am
Tags: , , , , ,

I watched The Curious Case of Benjamin Button in December. BBC’s Strand podcast (31st Jan 09 edition) reviewed it, and they didn’t have a very high opinion of it either. The movie is 2 hours and 48 minutes long. I can handle a Tamizh movie that long, but an English padam that goes on and on like the was Button does is a smidge intolerable. And, to top it, it was somewhat pretentious, assuming the air of a grand epic film that captured the human condition, where in fact, it was merely a thin veneer of pretense that covered a flimsy, somewhat annoying yawnfest of a story.

However, bad movies make for interesting parodies.

I recently learned that the writer of Button also wrote Forrest Gump. Some great chap has made a mashup of the two, and it’s quite funny. I poked around on the site for the code to embed the video, and being somewhat inept at all this Web 2.0 shite, it took me about a minute to realise that the word ‘Embed’ was writ in the centre of the screen in bold. Anyway, without further adieu, I present ‘The Curious Case of Forrest Gump‘.

Update – As I said, I’m not good at all this embedding nonsense, and tend to get very frustrated when technology doesn’t work immediately and perfectly. I tried embedding the video and the stupid thing just displayed the embedding code. Either there’s a problem with the original site, or, I’m useless. In either case, here is the video.

‘Life is a box of chocolates, you never know what you’re going to get,’ has to be one of the silliest things I’ve ever heard. How did Tom Hanks not laugh in that woman’s face? I suppse that’s what separates actors from the rest of us – the ability control their laughter in the face of side-splitting lines like these.

 

Phantom India (L’Inde Phantom) February 1, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 9:35 am
Tags: , , , , , ,

Last week, I read of a documentary on India by a French filmmaker, Louis Malle. After reading a review of it in the NY Times, I decided to borrow it from Rentertainment, a Champaign DVD rental store. The review was unabashedly positive, speaking of an “epic portrait of a nation” or some such thing. Made in 1968, to me, it presented an opportunity to see India, albeit through a foreigner’s lens, from a period I really had no clue about – the 60s, to me, were defined by the anti-Hindi riots in Tamil Nadu (in which my father claims to have participated).

Since my computer refused to play the DVD, I went over to Kaushik’s place and he, Vivek and I sat down to watch it. The first episode (of six) is called ‘The Impossible Camera’ and starts off with Malle saying (as a voice-over) that talking to the middle and upper classes gives him no perspective of the real India, and how he and his mates are going to traipse about filming whatever they see instead of having a pre-determined script or even an outline. Fine idea, I suppose, as the 1st episode does a pretty decent job of showing off parts of India that I hadn’t seen before – fishermen on the Andhra coast haggling with dealers and middlemen, a Hanuman dance in Mysore (incorrectly labelled ‘Muslims dancing for Muharram’ by Malle), vultures and dogs pecking away at the carcass of a buffalo, Kerala’s communist legions opposing a rise in postage prices and the wedding ceremony in the Gypsy (Nari Korava) community. For inexplicable reason, he also interviews two stoned Frenchmen and speaks to an disillusioned Italian nudist.

The 2nd episode, the reason I really wanted to watch this series was about Madras. ‘Ah,’ I thought, ‘Despite being completely clueless about the rest of India, I can tell how well he does Madras.’ It starts off reasonably well at the Chariot Festival from Mylapore Tank. Then we see ‘Mohammed bin Tuglaq’ and a mini-interview of Cho. We are taken to the sets of ‘Thillana Mohanambal’ and to a family planning clinic. So far, really interesting. Very cool stuff, Madras like I’ve never seen before.

Then, he ventures into Kalakshetra Foundation, at the time, beyond the outskirts of the city. Speaking to Bharatnatyam dancers and teachers, he begins to film the lessons (after much hesitation on the part of the Foundation’s authorities). And films. And films. And films. This goes on for about 20 or 25 minutes. At this point, all three of us had lost interest, and were verging on the point of irritation. Where was the beach? The lighthouse? Cooum? Adyar River? Fort St. George? The railways, buses, Central Station? Ripon Building? T. Nagar? Nothing. None of these captured Malle’s attention, and he spent (or wasted, depending on your PoV) 25 minutes filming Bharatnatyam dancers. While I have great appreciation of the art form and the artists, I think it’s unfair to the viewer to say that the episode is about Madras and not show the city at all.

Now, we had some sort of baseline to compare with – and decided that despite our limited knowledge of the rest of India, this chap couldn’t really do justice to it. Give up only are there.

 

Nano-blogging January 29, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 6:02 pm
Tags: , , , , , ,

Over the past year or so, I’ve been addicted to a fantastic product called Google Reader. Google Reader, for the uninitiated, is, to quote Google’s own description, “an inbox for the Web”.

A little background – blogs and websites with frequently updated content have made it easier for people to read and peruse through a technology called RSS (Really Simple Syndication). True to its name, RSS is pretty easy to use, and needless to mention, really awesome.

In the right-hand corner of the address bar, notice that certain websites have and orange colour logo that looks like waves emerging from a point in a pond. That indicates that the site can be added to an RSS Reader (or “feed” reader) and whenever it is updated, the reader will give you an indication of this, and some, such as Google’s will allow you to read stuff from within them, fetching pages for you, upon request.

The great thing about Google Reader is how easy it is to use. The Google Reader blog describes, with an instructional video, how to set it up. What’s even better about Reader is its reach and networking abilities. By this, I mean, that if you are friends with someone through Google Talk or Gmail Chat, you can see some of their items, if they choose to “Share” them. The share feature is unique because it allows you to see what other people are reading, and if you find the article in question interesting, you can easily add it to your list of feeds or blogs.

I realise that this is an AWFUL explanation of Google Reader, but that wasn’t the point of the article actually, I seem to have meandered while providing background. Do check it out though (after you finish reading the rest of what I have to say, of course, heh heh).

Where was I? Right, right, the awesomeness of Reader. Soon after I started using Reader, my blogput (that’s a clever portmanteau of blog and output, isn’t it?) dropped, and I spent some time thinking why. My food got cold and a few days later, spiders began to weave their webs around me. Okay, enough of attempting to be funny. I realised that there was much more to read about and listen to what other people had to say than to talk myself. Over the past year, I’ve perused at least a thousand articles that I’ve found interesting and said nought on my blog (my old blog), just because I’ve had nought to say. Don’t know why I’m back though, but that’s neither here nor there.

But, in an attempt to produce some minimal amount of creative output, I’ve pioneered the concept of nano-blogging (Note – this is not blogging from a Tata Nano, though that would interesting as well) (Note 2 – this also has nothing to do with blogging from the editor Nano) or gmailogging, whichever you prefer. It is the most unbelievably simple thing to do, and being unbelievably simple, I did it. Since you, the reader, are probably very popular and have a large contact list of friends, and, in all likelihood, have a Gmail account (if you don’t, what are you doing?) and use Gmail Chat or Google Talk, the status message bar can be your entire gmailog – all you need to do is put in a witty or profound sentence or two, and link to an item on the web that you found interesting. It has slightly limited reach, only to your friends who are online at the same time as you, but nonetheless, it’s a way to gain fame and fortune (well, fame anyway – though this is still to be empirically tested).

And there you have it. The smallest blog in the world, and the easiest to edit. I think it’s funny that I’ve spent 705 words talking about it, though. Other people have done it too, but I was the one who came up with that cool portmanteau – say it to yourself. No, not ‘portmanteau’. ‘Gmailog’. ‘Gmailog’. And thank me when you’re the life of the party. “Ooh, he’s the dude what has that cool gmailog… let’s go talk to him.” Link them to my blog as part of the appreciation, there’s a good fella.

 

Here is Gone January 28, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 11:32 pm

Isn’t it odd the way sometimes nostalgia happens upon us from the unlikeliest of sources? This evening, I longed to listen to the song ‘Here is Gone’ by the Goo-G0o Dolls. I don’t know why, it was sort-of like craving chocolate or grapes or something like that. Entirely mood-dependent, I imagine. That’s the funny thing though. I wasn’t nostalgic earlier this evening. I just want to listen to this song (which I think is pretty nice). But now I am nostalgic, and not entirely sure, why or even of what.

Nostalgia, in my experience, has been a function of association with specific events in the past. Sometimes, I just long the relive those halcyon moments. That’s why this present bout of nostalgia feels strange to me – nostalgia might not even be the right word for it.

I just feel like I’ve lost something, something of importance, but it’s vague, fuzzy, nothing in particular. Perhaps it’s associated with yesterday’s post about my move to Madras and the first associations I have with the city.

I don’t think it’s that, though. I first heard this song in 10th std., when I was in someone’s car. Don’t remember whose, but I think it was in January or February and we were on Chamiers Rd. between Greenways Rd. and TTK Rd, with that lovely overgrown green space to my left, bordered by a red patchwork of a wall that had fist-sized holes at regular intervals. I don’t know what exactly gives me the assurance that this is a genuine memory, not some trick conjured up by my mind, but it feels real and I can almost feel the scene around me.

Maybe it’s the song itself, talking about “Somehow, here is gone”. With the tremendous amount of change that has happened since I first heard the song, this line rings hauntingly familiar and true.

 

My early days in Madras (1997-98) January 28, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — Navaneethan @ 12:08 am

On 4th June 1997, I arrived in Madras and was picked up by my father at the airport. I was 10 at the time and we had just shifted from Bombay – my father had moved to a company based in Chennai. Our home, a rented one, was on Arunachalam Road in Kotturpuram. All my life before this I had lived in flats in Bandra, and the idea of living in an independent house was terribly exciting.

We reached the house – it was at the end of a cul-de-sac, Arunachalam Road having 2 sections, one perpendicular to the other, and was bordered on one side by an empty plot and on the other by a unpainted, squat little house. The house, at first glance, was really beautiful. There was a small garage, in the front, and a courtyard through a white plastic door. Immediately to the right of the gate was a narrow path that led to the well and the minuscule backyard that was used for hanging up the laundry and had a covered latrine for the domestic staff. Right by the path was a short flight of steps, leading to the front verandah and finally the front door.

I ran through the house, in seemingly whirlwind fashion, exploring its various facets and was entranced by the staircase – a staircase! in my own house! – and flew up it to the upstairs hall – a room that would be the very centre of my existence for the next few years. It was lit up, inefficiently, but very prettily by 4 rows of small light bulbs and, through a wood-lined arch, led to a bright, airy study.

Abutting the arch were two beautiful stained glass windows, one on each side. I can’t tell you how impressed I was by them. I had exhausted myself through the hurricane-esque sweep of the house and stood in front of them panting, with my eyes agog. 3 years later, while miscuing a Powerbomb on a plastic stool, I would remember that very moment as the bottom half of one of the windows cracked (my parents assumed it was the painters, who had covered the furniture in off-white sheets and left their crusty brushes, buckets and thinner all over the house – absolving me of the blame, though the guilt remained long after).

I then ran in to the room on my right, where my mother was reading a book. I hugged her, and then turned to look around the room. One window overlooked the aforementioned empty plot, and the other overlooked the next-door neighbour’s balcony. The breeze blew in gently, strange for a June afternoon, and I was hooked. I loved the place and hoped I would never leave it.

We had some great times there. The house had a ton of character. Be it the fact that one room had tiles of two different colours, a guest room on the ground floor that possessed a somewhat mysterious chest-of-drawers or the strange lights in the upstairs room that could only be controlled as rows. My parents’ room had a small dresser that, as far as I could see, served no real purpose, but I loved it anyway. My bathroom, on the first day I used it, appeared to have no discernible source of lighting – with the brightness of the summer sun, I had failed to notice that the translucent plastic panels above that hid the source.

More important than the house, to me, was the locale. Kotturpuram was (and probably is) one of the quieter neighbourhoods in the city. My branch of Arunachalam Road was even quieter than the rest of the area because we were as far back from Gandhi Mandapam Road as one could be. Back in ‘97, the cul-de-sac was barely paved. This made for some interesting times when my cousins from Valasaravaakam and Mylapore visited, or when my school senior, who lived at the corner played cricket with self and classmate in the afternoons after school.

I had become obsessed with the sport the previous year, during the Wills World Cup. My building in Bombay, Sandele, had a big front yard, and I used to play there either with classmates or my father, who constantly encouraged me to bowl straight. In the Arunachalam Road context, cricket became an exciting sport. We used one of the gate pillars of my house for a wicket and marked off a bowling crease some distance away. Thanks to the unpaved nature of the road, the bounce was unpredictable. Once, while bowling to my driver, I let fly a ball that I thought would be a low-pitched yorker, but instead, it hit a stone embedded in the pitch and bounced well over his head. The following year, one blazing summer afternoon (if you remember, 1998 was, for a long time, the hottest year on record) when my father and I were coming back from our weekly trip to Vaanga Vaanga supermarket (I could be wrong though – were were coming back from somewhere in Adyar, at any rate), I saw the road-rollers and tar machines that would mark the end of the pitch that I fondly thought of as being more unpredictable than Guwahati (where, the previous December or January, an India-Sri Lanka match had been called off on account of ‘dangerous pitch condition’ – never mind the exhibition match that immediately followed). I continued to play cricket there for a few years, though, thanks to football, laziness and other intervening agents, I would have almost forgotten about it when we moved out of that house at the beginning of 2003, during my pre-board exams for 10th.

The reason (or reasons) for why I’m reminiscing about a 12-year-old memory are strnage. My father, clever man that he is, cannot or will not remember names. Our neighbours, who moved in a few days or weeks after we did, had a son around my age called Abhimanyu. I knew him fairly well, and would spend time at his house playing computer games that I didn’t care for very much, or practising our putting my plastic golf set (gifted to me on my 11th birthday) on his lawn.

My father has always referred to him as ‘Anubhav’. On several occasions during dinner or while watching the telly or even on the phone, he has asked me: “Ah… what happened to him?”

Me: “Yaaru?” (knowing from experience exactly who he meant)

F: “Andha paiyyan – neighbour… what’s his name? Anubhav-aa?”

Me: “Oh… not sure, theriyalei. He graduated from USC, but I don’t know where he is now.”

A few days ago, I discussed with the pater my interests in the neuroscience of vision, specifically in disorders such as prosopagnosia, that renders a person incapable of recognising faces.

F:  “Yeah, that’s quite interesting. You know, I think I have problems putting faces to names – why is that, do you know? You should study that.”

Me (while laughing): “Yeah, the fact that you called our neighbour ‘Anubhav’ is testimony to that.”

F: “Oh! That was that boy – used to live on Arunachalam Road. Whatever happened to him?”

A flood of memories rushed through me. I fell silent.

F: “I wonder what happened to him, and that place. Should visit it sometime, no?”